From owner-fsj-digest-at-digest.net Wed Feb 1 09:15:42 2006 From: fsj-digest fsj-digest Wednesday, February 1 2006 Volume 01 : Number 2579 Forum for Discussion of Full Sized SJ Series Jeeps Brian Colucci Digest Coordinator Contents: Re: fsj: 67 Wagoneer hubcap sought RE: fsj: 67 Wagoneer hubcap sought RE: fsj: 67 Wagoneer hubcap sought fsj: administrivia: notes on using this list fsj: Re: xj: 42RE FSJ Digest Home Page: http://www.digest.net/jeeps/fsj/ Send submissions to fsj-digest-at-digest.net Send administrative requests to fsj-digest-request-at-digest.net To unsubscribe, include the word unsubscribe by itself in the body of the message, unless you are sending the request from a different address than the one that appears on the list. Include the word help in a message to fsj-digest-request to get a list of other majordomo commands. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:07:16 -0800 (PST) From: john Subject: Re: fsj: 67 Wagoneer hubcap sought the '67 would have come with a 327, the 350 was available in 1968. It seems to me that Jeep introduced models in August, some states might have registered a '68 as a '67. Just a thought. the front hubcaps will have hole in the center, probably baby moon style... john On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Watry, Andrew (LNG-SFR) wrote: >-->I got the 67 Wagoneer with Buick 350 I mentioned last week. What with >-->"350" badges on the front fenders, I'd guess the 350 is original to this >-->Jeep, not dropped in later. It's been sitting for four/five years, but >-->with a new battery and some gas I fired it up and drove it the whole >-->five miles home from Oakland. So far so good. Now has new gas, oil, >-->filters. Still has cold AC, amazingly. Rebuilt engine 10 years ago in >-->LA. Thousands of $$ in work done in the mid 90s, then spent a couple >-->years in Billings, Montana, back in California since 2000 and sitting >-->since then. >--> >-->It's missing one of its front hubcaps. Anybody have one for sale, or >-->know where to get one? I can email a picture of the style I'm looking >-->for. Thanks. >--> >-->Andrew Watry >-->Berkeley, CA >--> ---- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** http://JohnMeister.com **** http://wagoneers.com ** Snohomish, Washington USA - where Jeeps don't rust, they mold ** http://freegift.net *** http://greatcom.org/laws/languages.html ** - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:01:53 -0800 (PST) From: john Subject: RE: fsj: 67 Wagoneer hubcap sought On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Watry, Andrew (LNG-SFR) wrote: >-->Looks like this. Any idea where to find one? http://wagoneers.com/tmp/fsj-hubcap-67.jpg olympic 4x4? hubcaps'r'us? :) jim blair? bj's, ??? john >-->Thanks >-->Andrew >--> >-->-----Original Message----- >-->From: john [mailto:john-at-superdawg.wagoneers.com] >-->Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 9:07 AM >-->To: Watry, Andrew (LNG-SFR) >-->Cc: fsj-at-digest.net >-->Subject: Re: fsj: 67 Wagoneer hubcap sought >--> >--> >--> >-->the '67 would have come with a 327, the 350 was available in 1968. It >-->seems to me that Jeep introduced models in August, some >-->states might have registered a '68 as a '67. Just a thought. >--> >-->the front hubcaps will have hole in the center, probably >-->baby moon style... >--> >-->john >--> >-->On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Watry, Andrew (LNG-SFR) wrote: >--> >-->>-->I got the 67 Wagoneer with Buick 350 I mentioned last week. What >-->>-->with "350" badges on the front fenders, I'd guess the 350 is >-->>-->original to this Jeep, not dropped in later. It's been sitting for >-->>-->four/five years, but with a new battery and some gas I fired it up >-->>-->and drove it the whole five miles home from Oakland. So far so >-->>-->good. Now has new gas, oil, filters. Still has cold AC, amazingly. >-->>-->Rebuilt engine 10 years ago in LA. Thousands of $$ in work done in >-->>-->the mid 90s, then spent a couple years in Billings, Montana, back in >-->>-->California since 2000 and sitting since then. >-->>--> >-->>-->It's missing one of its front hubcaps. Anybody have one for sale, or >-->>-->know where to get one? I can email a picture of the style I'm >-->>-->looking for. Thanks. >-->>--> >-->>-->Andrew Watry >-->>-->Berkeley, CA >-->>--> >--> >--> ---- >--> >-->------------------------------------------------------------------------- >--> ** http://JohnMeister.com **** http://wagoneers.com ** >--> Snohomish, Washington USA - where Jeeps don't rust, they mold >--> ** http://freegift.net *** http://greatcom.org/laws/languages.html ** >-->------------------------------------------------------------------------- >--> >--> ---- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** http://JohnMeister.com **** http://wagoneers.com ** Snohomish, Washington USA - where Jeeps don't rust, they mold ** http://freegift.net *** http://greatcom.org/laws/languages.html ** - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:40:44 -0500 From: "Watry, Andrew \(LNG-SFR\)" Subject: RE: fsj: 67 Wagoneer hubcap sought Thanks for posting. I'll try these places. If anyone knows where to get one, please let me know. Andrew - -----Original Message----- From: john [mailto:john-at-superdawg.wagoneers.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 2:02 PM To: Watry, Andrew (LNG-SFR) Cc: full size jeep list Subject: RE: fsj: 67 Wagoneer hubcap sought On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Watry, Andrew (LNG-SFR) wrote: >-->Looks like this. Any idea where to find one? http://wagoneers.com/tmp/fsj-hubcap-67.jpg olympic 4x4? hubcaps'r'us? :) jim blair? bj's, ??? john >-->Thanks >-->Andrew >--> >-->-----Original Message----- >-->From: john [mailto:john-at-superdawg.wagoneers.com] >-->Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 9:07 AM >-->To: Watry, Andrew (LNG-SFR) >-->Cc: fsj-at-digest.net >-->Subject: Re: fsj: 67 Wagoneer hubcap sought >--> >--> >--> >-->the '67 would have come with a 327, the 350 was available in 1968. >-->It seems to me that Jeep introduced models in August, some >-->states might have registered a '68 as a '67. Just a thought. >--> >-->the front hubcaps will have hole in the center, probably baby moon >-->style... >--> >-->john >--> >-->On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Watry, Andrew (LNG-SFR) wrote: >--> >-->>-->I got the 67 Wagoneer with Buick 350 I mentioned last week. >-->>-->What >-->>-->with "350" badges on the front fenders, I'd guess the 350 is >-->>-->original to this Jeep, not dropped in later. It's been sitting for >-->>-->four/five years, but with a new battery and some gas I fired it up >-->>-->and drove it the whole five miles home from Oakland. So far so >-->>-->good. Now has new gas, oil, filters. Still has cold AC, amazingly. >-->>-->Rebuilt engine 10 years ago in LA. Thousands of $$ in work done in >-->>-->the mid 90s, then spent a couple years in Billings, Montana, back in >-->>-->California since 2000 and sitting since then. >-->>--> >-->>-->It's missing one of its front hubcaps. Anybody have one for >-->>-->sale, or >-->>-->know where to get one? I can email a picture of the style I'm >-->>-->looking for. Thanks. >-->>--> >-->>-->Andrew Watry >-->>-->Berkeley, CA >-->>--> >--> >--> ---- >--> >-->-------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----- >--> ** http://JohnMeister.com **** http://wagoneers.com ** >--> Snohomish, Washington USA - where Jeeps don't rust, they mold >--> ** http://freegift.net *** http://greatcom.org/laws/languages.html >-->** >-->-------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----- >--> >--> ---- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - ** http://JohnMeister.com **** http://wagoneers.com ** Snohomish, Washington USA - where Jeeps don't rust, they mold ** http://freegift.net *** http://greatcom.org/laws/languages.html ** - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:15:00 +0000 From: Richard Welty Subject: fsj: administrivia: notes on using this list Digest.Net mailing list "Meta FAQ" These general notes on using Digest.Net mailing lists are posted on the 1st and 15th of each month. This file may be found on the web at http://www.digest.net/general-notes.txt [last revised 5/1/02; removed list of spam strings, as i'm not the only one filtering on them -- rpw] Additional information on Digest.Net's spam policies may be found at http://www.digest.net/email-policy.html and http://www.digest.net/blocked.html Table of Contents 1. Why don't my postings go through? 2. Why can't I unsubscribe? 3. How do I post to the list? 4. Where are the archives? 5. What other lists are on digest.net? 6. Is there a web subscription form? 7. Why not move the lists to someplace like (egroups, topica,...)? 8. How do I contact the server adminstrator in an emergency? 9. What is Krusty Motorsports, anyway? The Meta-FAQ 1. Why don't my postings go through? There are several things that may interfere with postings making it to the list. a) Are you a member? Some read the ftp archives rather than receiving the list in email. Persons who read the list via email are automatically members, but readers of the FTP archive are not, and need to contact me (rwelty-at-krusty-motorsports.com) and get your name added to the list of "permitted senders". b) has your email address changed? some of you have had changes in your email address. your old address still works, and is still on the list, but your From: line shows a new address. this can happen for various reasons; you may have changed jobs or ISPs, and left a forward in place, or your IT staff may have fiddled with the email system. you will need to unsubscribe your old email address and subscribe the new one. this may require my involvement, if you can't figure out a way to get your old address off the list using the conventional majordomo commands. you can use the majordomo "which" command to probe for old addresses. send a message to majordomo-at-digest.net with one or more which commands in the body, one per line. to check for potential addresses for Fred Flinstone, formerly of bedrock.org, the following commands can be sent: which flintstone which bedrock note that the matches above might return any of the following addresses, if they appear in the list (in other words, you can use vagueness and incompleteness in your recollection as a tool): Fred.Flinstone-at-bedrock.org fflinstone-at-wilma.bedrock.org flintstonef-at-bedrock.com c) do you have more than one email address? if so, only the subscribed addresses can post, unless you contact me (see 1.a) above for relevant information) d) are you using (intentionally or accidentially) special "features" of your mail client? [this section is no longer operative, as the demime software now strips html, attachments, rich text format, etc. from postings automatically.] e) are your posts too large? there is a 10,000 character limit on posting sizes; this is done for various reasons. you can always split up large postings to get mail through. f) are you including majordomo commands at the start of your message? administrivia control is turned on; this is a trap for things like "unsubscribe" at the start of a message. try to avoid obvious majordomo commands in the subject and the first 10 lines, or misspell them in obvious ways (e.g. unzubscribe, 1ndex, h3lp, g3t, etc.) g) are you triggering spam traps? some things are red flags; for example, many phrases found commonly in spam are automatically blocked. h) are you using "funky" character sets? [7 bit restriction lifted experimentally on 8/2/00 -- film at 11] unfortunately, there are "issues" if i permit any character set other than old fashioned 7 level ASCII; therefore, you need to avoid national character sets that include various accents, umlauts, national currency characters such as the British pound symbol, etc. i) are you unintentionally including complete digests in your reply? You need to check and make sure you cut down replys to the minimal size; digests are between 20,000 and 25,000 characters in length, and if you include a complete digest in your reply, it clearly won't make the 10,000 character limit. By the way, this feature is intentional. j) Are you using a "bad" ISP or mail relay? See http://www.digest.net/email-policy.html for more information about Digest.Net policies about email. k) Is the error message you get back "User Unknown"? If so, you may be running afoul of spam control severices (again, see http://www.digest.net/email-policy.html) When these services register a hit, the error code 550 is returned. 550 is a generic code that many broken mail systems report as "user unknown". The "rejectlog" entries for the previous day's mail traffic on digest.net may be viewed at http://www.digest.net/rejectlog.01 Some of you may find it useful or instructive to use the telnet program to connect directly to port 25 on krusty-motorsports.com and see what kind of reply you get; this requires some technical knowledge and is not for everyone (you can get out of this at anytime after the initial banner simply by typing quit and hitting enter.) l) Is SMTP over TLS involved? This is a bit esoteric, but as of 8/8/01 the digest.net mail server will attempt to use "TLS" (Transport Layer Security) for outbound mail if the destination mail server offers it. SMTP over TLS is fairly new technology, and a bit buggy. I am monitoring the logs on the server, and when I see TLS related problems, I manually place the problem destinations on a special exception list; however, this may delay email to the destination host until I make the exception. 2. Why can't I unsubscribe? a) are you using the right address? send to majordomo-at-digest.net, and the command format is unsubscribe list-name my-email-address b) has your email address changed? majordomo has no way of knowing that Fred.Flinstone-at-BarneyCo.com was once fflintstone-at-bedrock.org. you can check this with the which command (see 1.b) above for details) 3. How do I post to the list? You may use either one of two addresses: for example, the bmw-digest may be reached using either bmw-at-digest.net or bmw-digest-at-digest.net If you are using the correct addresses and your posts don't show up, check out the stuff in 1. above. 4. Where are the archives? see ftp://ftp.digest.net/ for digest archives. the web archives have proven problematic, and are awaiting time for a systematic attack on the problems they've been having. 5. What other lists are on digest.net? see http://www.digest.net/ for more information. 6. Is there a web subscription form? Yes, recently added. go to http://www.digest.net/bin/digest-subs.cgi 7. Why not move the lists to someplace like (egroups, topica,...)? The Krusty Motorsports server (aka, digest.net) was explicitly to provide for efficient management of the various automotive mailing lists, done the way that the owner of the server wanted it done. Any migration off of the server (which is already bought, paid for, and configured) would create any number of issues. 8. How do i contact the Server Administrator in an emergency? If my regular email address (rwelty-at-krusty-motorsports.com) isn't working for you, you can fall back on rwelty-at-suespammers.org 9. What is Krusty Motorsports, anyway? Krusty Motorsports (http:/www.krusty-motorsports.com/) is a business which is owned and operated by Richard Welty (rwelty-at-krusty-motorsports.com). Krusty is an S-Corporation in the State of New York. Krusty provides a number of Internet related services, such as mailing list, web sites, pop3/telnet accounts, and consulting on internet related issues. For more information, see the web site. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:14:54 -0800 (PST) From: john Subject: fsj: Re: xj: 42RE if the 42re and 45rfe share the same case that would be ideal for an upgrade... however, when I ordered the filters/gaskets for both of my wj's the 42re got a gasket and one filter like used in a 727/aw4/th400. The 45rfe got a spin on filter, a long flat filter like the 42re but no pan gasket. I have both, I'll photograph both for comparison when it's not dark or raining... (can you wait until July 5? ;) john On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Allen Zylstra wrote: >-->I have the 42re in mine with the 4.0l. Currently 147K. I don't know if >-->it is original or not. Still works well. Maintenance and not >-->overworking them is key to there longevity. The need band adjustments and >-->the proper fluid. It is a 904 with and electric overdrive. The can be >-->made fairly stout too. The larger the number the more torque it is >-->supposely rated for. That is the info I got. I think the cases are the >-->same. >--> >-->The 42re to me is the ZJ's only downfall otherwise it is great vehicle. >--> >-->I have done some research so that I will be prepared when it fails. I >-->don't treat it nice. Towed 4000lbs for 400 miles. >--> >-->The WJ and WK use the 5sp version I think. I drove a WK for 2 weeks and >-->hated it. Had the 3.7l and 2wd. Didn't work well in the South Alabama >-->sand. The WJ was the last true Jeep other than the TJ. >--> >--> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >--> >--> From: john >--> Reply-To: xj-at-digest.net >--> To: xj-at-digest.net >--> Subject: Re: xj: alittle off topic need a ZJ 2" reciever hitch. >--> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 07:31:05 -0800 (PST) >--> >in the WJ's behind the 4.7L they used the 45RFE. Mine >--> >had 130,000 on it and doing fine... not as confident >--> >in the 42RE though. they are different. >--> > >--> >I know that many folks that have had ZJ's have had troubles >--> >with the AT behind the 4.0L. I believe it was the 42RE, but >--> >I could be wrong. >--> > >--> >I went through this once before and pulled the specs out >--> >of both trannies out of the WJ manual, should be in the digests >--> >on wagoneers.com >--> > >--> >john >--> > >--> >On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Allen Zylstra wrote: >--> > >--> > >-->Thanks, but I just bought one on ebay last night. Good deal. >--> $75 >--> > >-->including the shipping. I am in GA. I plan to build my 42re >--> when it >--> > >-->comes time. Is the core for a v8, v6 or the I6? I think that >--> they only >--> > >-->used the 42re behind the 3.9 and 4.0l and the 44re behind the >--> 5.2 and >--> > >-->the 46 behind the 5.9. I am still researching a feasible turbo >--> diesel >--> > >-->swap into the ZJ. Maybe an Isuzu or toyota. Allen >--> > >--> >--> > >--> >--> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >--> > >--> >--> > >--> From: "Jim Blair" >--> > >--> Reply-To: xj-at-digest.net >--> > >--> To: xj-at-digest.net >--> > >--> Subject: Re: xj: alittle off topic need a ZJ 2" reciever >--> hitch. >--> > >--> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:11:25 -0800 >--> > >--> >A: Give me a location and I can post up to the ZJ list I'm >--> on (been >--> > >--> >watching for a core 42RE for free or cheap to build for my >--> J4000) >--> > >--> > ---- >--> > >--> >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >--> > ** http://JohnMeister.com **** http://wagoneers.com ** >--> > Snohomish, Washington USA - where Jeeps don't rust, they mold >--> > ** http://freegift.net *** http://greatcom.org/laws/languages.html >--> ** >--> >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >--> ---- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** http://JohnMeister.com **** http://wagoneers.com ** Snohomish, Washington USA - where Jeeps don't rust, they mold ** http://freegift.net *** http://greatcom.org/laws/languages.html ** - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ End of fsj-digest V1 #2579 **************************